PDA

View Full Version : Heavy releases from Lake Okeechobee likely to start Saturday


Converted
08-21-2003, 04:04 PM
By Suzanne Wentley staff writer
August 21, 2003

Heavy, continuous releases from Lake Okeechobee are likely to begin Saturday for the first time since 1999, after Hurricane Irene struck, water managers said Wednesday.

For the first time in four years, the lake will today likely reach the level at which water managers abandon "pulse-style" discharges in favor of continuous releases into the St. Lucie Estuary. That level varies according to season.

Pulse releases — which will likely end Friday — mimic natural rainstorms by varying the amount of water flowing into the estuary to limit negative effects.

River activists fear continuous releases will further harm the stressed marine life in local waterways.

Although a formal discussion among scientists with the South Florida Water Management District and the Army Corps of Engineers is scheduled for today, officials from both agencies agreed a constant release of 2,500 cubic feet — or 18,701 gallons — per second will likely flow from the St. Lucie Locks indefinitely.

"We're at a point where there's a real possibility of increased discharges from Lake Okeechobee, beyond the pulse mode we've seen for over a year," said Tommy Strowd, director of water operations for the water management district.

Marine biologists and St. Lucie River advocates said they expect to see fish lesions within 30 to 45 days after constant discharges begin. An outbreak of such lesions stymied the local tourism economy in 1998.

"I'm a little surprised that we haven't seen any (lesions) yet," said Ann Forstchen, a fish health biologist with the Florida Marine Research Institute. "The pulse releases do allow the estuary to recover in between. It's once they start the prolonged releases, where the salinity drops and stays very low for a long period of time, then we'd expect to see an increase in lesions."

Susan Sylvester, a water management specialist with the Army Corps of Engineers in Jacksonville, said engineers today will discuss the rising lake level, the increasing flow into the lake from the Kissimmee River and the above-average rainfall predicted.

Constant releases are "extremely likely," she said.

On Wednesday, Lake Okeechobee stood at 16.02 feet above sea level — less than a quarter of an inch from the level at which water managers can start continuous releases.

However, 130 days of pulse releases this year — along with heavy rainfall runoff — have dropped salinity in the St. Lucie River to critically low levels.

On Aug. 14, the amount of salt in the water dropped to less than one part per thousand at the Roosevelt Bridge, causing severe stress to the oysters, sea grasses and other organisms that rely on salinity in the brackish ecosystem.

Kevin Henderson, executive director of the St. Lucie River Initiative, said activists have been lobbying water managers to keep the lake between 13.5 and 15.5 feet above sea level, but Lake Okeechobee never dropped below 14.5 feet even at the end of the dry season.

"That extra foot, we never got there," he said. "If they had done that with the pulse releases, we would still be in the safe zone."

Henderson said he'll begin the wait for an increase in lesioned fish caught in the inland waters in Martin and St. Lucie counties.

"Why do we have this deja vu all over again?" he said.

Converted
08-21-2003, 04:07 PM
http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/h2o/plots/s308h.gif

If this chart is correct then there were no pulse releases from July 22 thru Aug 2nd. Also there were none between Aug 8 and Aug 13.

Does someone want the lake to get to 16.25 so that continuous releases can begin:confused:

RutnNStrutn
08-21-2003, 08:24 PM
And Fabian is on the way with S. Florida in the bullseye, but it's still eary, the trajectory could change. If not, it could get really ugly, and wet down there.

N. Cook
08-22-2003, 09:21 AM
A good part of the problem is the large amount of rainfall in the Kissimmee river drainage area above the lake this year. Its hard to fathom what the SFWMD people are thinking, but I do not believe they are as consprical as often pictured. If they do heavy releases into the estatuaries early in the year or at the first sign of high water in the lake they are accused of killing the salt water fish....the pulses are obviously the best way, but if they underestimate the rainfall sooner or later the lake will be too high and then the heavy releases are manditory. As the water rises they are accused of holding water for the farmers....but only a year or so ago the water was so low everyone was complaining they could not even launch boats....some conspiracy! Then they went to backpumping and the same people complaining started raising **** about putting pollutiion in the lake. Lets face it.....there are a lot of competing interests and one or the other will always be screaming.....but FUNDAMENTALLY.....when there is excess rainfall the lake is going to be too high and when there is drought, too low, no matter what the SFWMD does. Just look at the history. The results of allowlng natural flow of water through the system as before the structures were built would flood a large portion of the area below the lake and fill FL BAy with fresh water in wet years, and those years of low rain would dry up large portions of the lake and the glades and Fl, BAy would be a salt marsh. This natural action would also bring cries of despair from the very same groups. Yes, SFWMD is managing to prevent flooding and thus will tend to err on the side of high water in the lake most years. This is not good for the lake and it is reasonalble to have work done on more efficient ways to move water out without hurting the brackish areas.....AND this is what CERP will hopefully do if it is done right.....AND that is another can of worms!

Converted
08-22-2003, 12:53 PM
Well, the constant releases have started early. They will go on for 10 days to two weeks then be evaluated.

I don't think it's a big conspiracy Newton. I understand that the corp and SFWMD have a difficult task and no one can predict the future. In my opinion however the current crisis that will be devasting to the St. Lucie estuary could have been avoided. It started when they tried to drain Lake toho. They got way too much water in Okeechobee and did not react agressively enough with pulse discharges to get the lake back down. All the rain certainly makes the problem worse but rain in the summer on Lake Okeechobee is to be expected.

I'm sure they're going to get an ear full on Monday if that meeting is still on for 10:00 at SFWMD.

D Duck
08-22-2003, 01:45 PM
I'm sure they'll get a chance to do it all over again when the rescheduled drawdown at Toho comes back into play this winter.